COMMON ANCESTRY FALSIFIABLE



This blog's intention is to document the condition of the structural, functional, and biochemical components that are integral to the function and or morphology associated with the origin of successive animal body plans, specifically the implausibility of natural materialistic influences as the sole causation of the Darwin concept of descent-with-modification-from-a-common-ancestor.

The field's literature that addresses a broad range of common ancestry concepts abounds in a rhetoric style that is characterized by indecisive relationships that became the targets of additional intended corrective rhetoric which present additional indecisive relationships that became the targets of additional intended corrective rhetoric, etc, etc, etc.

These rhetorical analyses commonly reference graphics that are presented as support the analyses primary conclusions but rarely is a figure presented and then analyzed for its implications on common ancestry.

The intention is to ground conclusions on the same graphics but analysed such that the rational establishes a level of self evidence that curtails much the typical refutation rhetoric that invariably represents common ancestry conformation biases, described as follows by behavioral sciences.

When we’re presented with evidence that counters our prior beliefs, instead of the new evidence swaying us toward a new or revised belief, it tends to reaffirm our prior beliefs.

This psychological quirk causes evidence supporting your beliefs to be perceived as plausible, and evidence challenging your beliefs to be perceived as implausible.

The technical term for one form of this irrational phenomenon is conformation bias.

(Radin, Dean Entangled Minds. http://www.deanradin.com/NewWeb/EMindex.html)

The discussed confounding relationships between protein synthesis and the implied concept mechanisms establish plausible grounds to conclude that natural materialistic processes do not solely account for new functions/morphologies originating via protein synthesis changes.

The following figure graphically displays a representative set of the animal evolution canonical causative concepts with their implied relationship in a simplified graphic of protein structure involved in synthesis.











THIS IS THE BACKGROUND FOR THE CLADOGRAM-TREE FIGURE





THIS IS THE BACKGROUND FOR THE MAIN CLADOGRAM

TRANSPOSONS
(Click For Summary)
HOR. GENE TRANSFER
(Click For Summary)
SPECIATION
(Click For Summary)
CONVERGENCE
(Click For Summary)
SISTER SPECIES
(Click For Summary)
DEV. GEN. REG. NET.
(Click For Summary)
LINEAGE ISOLATION
(Click For Summary)
GHOST LINEAGES
(Click For Summary)
ANAGENESIS/
CLADOGENESIS

(Click For Summary)
CLADOGRAM
OUTGROUPS

(Click For Summary)
BACTERIA
ORIGIN

(Click For Summary)
DERIVED TRAITS
(Click For Summary)
LIGAND BINDING
(Click For Summary)
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
(Lock & Key Ligand Binding)

(Click For Summary)
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
(Induced Fit Ligand Binding)

(under revision)
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
(Conformational-Selection
Ligand Binding)

(Click For Summary)
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
(Entangled Ligand Binding)

(under revision)